Showing posts with label AI Agents. Show all posts

Monday, March 16, 2026

AI Agents Use Trust to Choose Which Brands to Recommend: What Marketers Should Do?

Trust is the ranking factor in GEO (Generative Engine Optimization). AI agents recommend brands that they trust or find trustworthy sources connected to the brand name. The confusion between AEO and GEO is high all the time.

There is no clarity if the SEOs still follow traditional or AI SEO. Brands are already obsessed with ranking on AI results at ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Overviews, and AI Mode.

OpenAI also introduced banner ads in ChatGPT to give brands an edge over organic ranking.

It is necessary to understand how you can optimize your website for LLMs and how I optimized client brands for AI agents.

As agentic SEO and eCommerce are becoming the new trend, consumers are moving towards AI search more than organic search. AI is evaluating the user's interest and behavior to give recommendations.

This makes it a must to determine how to make AI agents trust our brand.

AI Agents Trust Determine Which Brands to Recommend: New Ranking Factor: eAskme

Other people are reading: ChatGPT Free and Premium Models Search the Web Differently

Trust Ranking Factor for AI Agents:

AI agents of ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini make citations based on user interest, but also based on the platforms they trust.

The biggest issue that every SEO needs to resolve is the Trust.

Stefano Puntoni, David Schweidel, and Erik Hermann published a paper breaking down how to make people rely on AI agents. Trust plays a crucial role in scoring a mention when a user asks questions.

I have shared the list of ranking factors for search Engines. It is time to look for AI agents. 

There are the 3 core components of building Trust.

1. Align goals with reasoning:

AI agents work hard to understand the user’s issues and how to choose the different options.

AI only recommends a brand that can defend human interest. It requires clear reasoning and risk management.

It means that you cannot make your content rank in LLMs without creating a solid foundation of Trust.
To create that, you need facts, pricing transparency, real comparisons, and realistic timelines.

2. Action with Feedback:

AI Agents also read feedback on feedback. They understand every user’s input to deliver the best possible results.

Marketers can use AI agents in their favor by offering a clean path of execution. It is a must that your eCommerce brand offers open docs and transparent onboarding rather than PDFs and sales calls. 

3. Interface:

Your AI agent needs to understand that what the customer requires is not based on training data but based on actual conversation. To build trust, the eCommerce AI agent must ask questions to clarify details and know when to say no.

Marketers should use AI agents as consultants. It must probe integration, compliance, budget, and constraints. You need details, FAQs, and comparisons to build trust.

Why Trust is a Ranking Factor in AI Agents:

Like Google Search Ranking, AI ranking also requires Trust, but both work at different levels.
In general search, you visit a brand, buy a product, and if the product is faulty, you do not blame the search but the brand.

But in AI search, everything changes.

AI is responsible for delivering the most valuable results. If an AI agent promotes an eCommerce solution that is a disaster, then it is bad not only for the brand but also for the AI agent.

Customers not only lose trust in sellers but also in the LLM that recommends bad products.

For vendors, AI agents work more than a recommendation tool. They need an AI agent they can rely on to make buying decisions.

It is the reason why AI agents work in favor of brands they can trust.

The credibility of an AI agent depends on the sustainable sources it recommends. Without adding trustworthy brand names, AI agents cannot achieve that.

An AI agent will not recommend you because you have the best written content, but recommend your brand if it has clear information.

Trust plays a vital role in gaining brand mentions in LLM results.

Visibility or Eligibility:

SparkToro published a report stating that every time you ask an AI agent for recommendations, they give different answers. It seems that on the outer layer, they work like search engines.

But in the core, the AI agent uses Trust as the markup to mention brands. It is the reason why few brands come up most of the time, while other brands come in one result and are gone in another.

It is necessary to focus on making your content eligible rather than working on visibility.

What Marketers Should Do:

The brands require credibility in their content and product pages to achieve maximum citations.

Here is how you can do it:

Legible Data:

Combine the optimization for AI with human SEO. Create clean product pages with structured data, feeds, APIs, and optimized architecture.

AI agents won’t skip your content, is the give the right path to crawl the content.

Get Rid of Ambiguity:

Release all facts in product pages. Add SLAs and pricing bands. Do not hide anything. AI agents love details. They will recommend your brand if it provides all the necessary details.

Strong Validation:

AI agents focus on Trust to reduce the risk of citing wrong brands or disastrous products. It is necessary to collect third-party proof. Get brand mentions in top publications and press releases. Ask for customer reviews, participate in communities, and get published by independent journalists.

Display Your Work:

AI agents can only see your work if it is visible. Add numbers to case studies, comparison tables, and investment models.

Conclusion:

Search is changing from browsing search engines to asking AI agents. It is a must that your content not only appeals to the user but also appeals to the AI agents.

Optimize your website and content pages for eligibility.

Other helpful articles:

Thursday, February 26, 2026

Why Multi-Agent Workflow Fails? Fixes

AI tools are doing everything with the help of AI agents. One AI agent is enough to complete multiple tasks. But sometimes, you need multiple agents to complete the complex tasks. This is where engineers get stuck.

The biggest issues with multi-agents are that they often fail or fail to collaborate. The most common AI agents’ failure includes missing agentic structure. You need to understand the 3 different engineering patterns that make AI agents reliable.

Developers working on multi-agent workflows often see failures.

Here is everything about Multi-Agent Workflow, how it works, and why it fails.

Why Multi-Agent Workflow Fails? Fixes: eAskme

Other people are readingNearby Glasses: Scan Smart Glasses Nearby

Multi-Agent Workflow Failure:

AI agents complete tasks based on the established system.

During this process, most of the failures occur.

For example, one agent complete task while the other is still working on it. This causes the collaboration issue. It can fail any downstream check.

Why downstream check fail?

The issue occurs when agents handle related tasks, such as:

  • Training issues
  • Run checks
  • Propose changes
  • Open Pull Request

During these tasks, AI agents make assumptions about:

  • State of request
  • Order
  • Validation

AI agents fail when they lack interfaces, instructions, and data formats.

AI agents handle the agentic experiences during multi-agent orchestration patterns and internal automation through GitHub Copilot. The role of an AI agent is to work as a distributed system, not as a chat interface.

Multi-Agent System:

A multi-agent system is required to complete a complex workflow. Introducing multi-agents also leads to an increasing number of agentic failures.

Developers use a multi-agent workflow:

  • Codebase Maintenance
  • Dependency Updates
  • Automated code quality checks
  • Refactors
  • Feature implementation
  • Pull requests and Issues.

These work when you work with constrained and explicit steps.

Here are the most common multi-Agent failure and fixes:

Messy Natural Language:

LLMs allow users to use natural language. Processing natural language in AI agentic language is itself a task. Multi-Agent workflow fails when multiple agents fail to exchange misleading or confused language. Inconsistent JSON also causes the issue.

When a team build AI agent, it creates contracting the early stage for easy understanding. AI agents also require clear data usage policies.

AI structure requires a strict schema and typed interfaces. Machines check data sent by AI agents. Wrong data immediately fails. This prevents mistakes from happening.

It is best to define exact steps to fix the issue. Defined steps make debugging easy. Schema errors work like broken contracts. If one thing is wrong, fix it before escalating it.

Note: Typed schemas are essential to prevent multi-agent workflow failures.

Lack of Specific Actions:

Multi-agents can fail even when the data is structured. It happens due to unclear instructions. The solution is to analyze the issue and add clear instructions.

An AI agent can get confused about:

  • What closes the issue
  • When to Assign
  • When to Escalate
  • When to do nothing

These issues seem reasonable for humans but not predictable.

An action schema is required to fix this issue. The action schema must define each allowed action.
Multi-agents require to return valid action to solve the issue. Invalid action results in escalation or retirement.

Note: Multi-agent failure happens when actions are unclear. It is best to define actions.

Optional MCP Rules:

Schemas only add value if they are enforced. Making rules optional reduces their value to suggestions. Make sure to add mandatory rules so that multiple agents must follow them.

Model Context Protocol (MCP) is the system that enforces mandatory schema rules.

Model Context Protocol (MCP) tells:

  • What input allows
  • What input is not allowed

MCP is required to prevent agents from inventing new fields. It is responsible for ensuring that multi-agents do not skip required inputs and cannot change formats.

Principles of Multi-Agent Systems:

You need to plan for failures. Check data at every step to ensure that you have not missed anything.

Before adding fields, make sure that it limits the possible actions. Keep a record of important steps.

Even though you did everything, still be ready for partial failures and retreats.

Note: In a multi-agent workflow, agents are a distributed system, not the chatbots.

Conclusion:

As an AI developer, your job is to ensure that the multi-agent workflow does not fail. You are responsible for creating a clear, structured multi-agent system.

Remember: AI agents can only work as reliable software components when they see type schemas, clear action definitions, and strict MCP enforcement.

Your takeaway is that you must take agents like code, not a chat conversation.

Other helpful articles: